web analytics
🥇 The Best Online Casinos Who Accept Cryptocurrency For 2020 ✔️
1st Deposit Bonus:
1 BTC
Bonus for New Players
100% MATCH BONUS
5.0 rating
5.0
1st Deposit Bonus:
100 EUR
Bonus for New Players
100% MATCH BONUS
4.8 rating
4.8
1st Deposit Bonus:
2 BTC
Bonus for New Players
100% MATCH BONUS
4.5 rating
4.5

Matic’s Bloodbath Can’t be Compared to What Befell ZClassic, Nano, or DigiByte

Matic Network

Matic, the token that had a successful IEO at Binance before pumping on listing, is on every trader’s mouth following steep losses in the last 24 hours. Although prices of most IEO tokens fail to live up to expectations after the initial excitement and FOMO, Matic’s crash velocity and timing is quite concerning.

Matic Post Double-Digit Losses

Matic

Coin trackers indicate that in the last 24 hours alone, its valuation has sunk by over 50%, posting double-digit losses against BTC, ETH and USD at 53%, 53% and 54%, respectively. Even though Matic’s price is up on a monthly basis, week-to-date, the token is down 39% highlighting how the dump has been sudden, fast and almost well-coordinated. Simply, it’s a carnage, the token is spiraling down, falling off a cliff much to the distress of expectant token holders.

Trading at $0.018112, the token is down 56% from its all-time highs. However, it is nothing compared to what befell hyped coins in the past. From crypto chronicles, ZClassic, Nano, DigiByte and Hush have experienced worse in their short life cycles.

In those formative years, the dump was far

more damaging not only to the project but to the whole ecosystem since the market was fragile and worse, treated with skepticism. A delisting from Bittrex or Poloniex, for example, was consequential as the resulting fund or liquidity starvation was hard pressing, even meaning an end to platform development.

DigiByte, ZClassic Losses were worse

The SEC has since tamed project shilling, classifying tokens from projects that attempt to use influencers for gain as securities. The crypto community vividly remembers the resulting DGB price dump that resulted when rumors of Minecraft launch on DigiByte failed to materialize back in 2017. Prices fell so deeply that DGB has yet to recover. At present, DGB is down 95% from its all-time highs, changing hands at $0.006445 from $0.1293448.

On the same frame, ZClassic has failed to recover and isn’t trending on the same levels as before. Back then, privacy coins as Monero and Bitcoin Private were dubbed as the future. Their superior mixers and privacy features were developed because Bitcoin’s transactions were pseudonymous. At present, ZClassic is trading at $0.2165571, down 99% after reaching highs of $213.02 in Dec 2017.

Evidently, Matic is sliding but is nothing compared to past disastrous market events that forced developers and investors away.

The post Matic’s Bloodbath Can’t be Compared to What Befell ZClassic, Nano, or DigiByte appeared first on Coingape.



Source: Matic’s Bloodbath Can’t be Compared to What Befell ZClassic, Nano, or DigiByte

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOT REQUIRED
Bonus Code
Get 25 FREE SPINS on Book of Dead
NOT REQUIRED
Bonus Code
1.5 mBTC FREE
Valid Until: Dec 31, 2020
NOT REQUIRED
Bonus Code
100% match bonus based on first deposit of £/$/€20+. Additional bonuses.
Valid Until: Dec 24, 2019
N/A
Bonus Code
100% match bonus based on first deposit of £/$/€20+. Additional bonuses.
Valid Until: Dec 31, 2019